Hollywood’s Jayavarman VII movie
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011As you already may have heard, there is a new movie being made about the “Great Khmer Empire”. John Cena, the former pro wrestler, will star as the great Khmer King Jayavarman VII. Angelina Jolie, Jet Li, and a few other recognizable Hollywood names will be in it, too.
Currently, the movie is still in production. The last time I read about the movie, they were “consulting” with the Cambodian government about the “historical accuracy” of the film. It’s interesting that they’re consulting with government officials, rather than scholars and historians, about the film’s historical accuracy.
Obviously, many Khmer people are very excited about this project because they think Hollywood is showing interest in our culture. Personally, I don’t think there is anything in this movie for Khmer people to celebrate about. Casting John Cena as Jayavarman VII, the greatest of Khmer kings, is about as credible as casting some Chinese guy as George Washington in a movie about the American Revolution. And the idea of making King Jayavarman VII look like some sort of Conan the Barbarian is a complete joke.
So why aren’t Khmer people laughing? Why are most Khmers embracing this movie as some sort of honor to them? I for one would feel rather awkward watching a movie supposedly about the The Great Khmer Empire in which none of the main characters could even pronounce the word “Khmer” properly. (No, it’s not “Khmair” or “Ga-mair” or “Xmer”.)
I think that we Khmers are so beleaguered– militarily, economically, morally, and psychologically– as a people that there’s hardly any objection within our community to the making of a movie about Khmer civilization where the main roles are being played exclusively by non-Khmer actors. Beleaguered means besieged, defeated, down and out. Granted, our civilization has endured a streak of bad luck for the last several centuries. Cambodia today is reduced to a small fraction of the Great Khmer Empire that we once were and our people scattered throughout the world. When foreigners visit Angkor Wat, they often express disbelief, in a mocking way, how a people once capable of building a monument of such grandeur could have declined to our present state.
While I am pleased that Hollywood is shown interest in our great past, I think it’s insulting to reduce the real Khmer people to token roles in a movie about our great ancestors. If the makers of this movie do not deem Khmer actors marketable to the Western audience, then the movie is probably better off done entirely in CGI (computer generated imagery). Can you imagine the outrage in the African American community if they were to make a movie about Martin Luther King, Jr., casting a white actor in black face as the great civil rights leader?
Speaking of civil rights, I think it’s absolutely wonderful to have an African American holding the highest office of the most powerful country on the planet. As brilliant as Barack Obama is, his success cannot be credited entirely to his own efforts alone. The rise of a black man to the US presidency did not start in Uncle Tom’s cabin. Rather, it is the culmination of the sacrifice, devotion, courage, and moral defiance of Abe Lincoln, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr., and countless other great people.
King Jayavarman VII was a great warrior. More than a warrior, he was a great intellectual, a planner and builder, a deeply spiritual person. Above all, he was a proud Khmer, a strong and assertive leader who probably would not have been very amused by this Hollywood shenanigan.
Come to think of it, the Khmers of the Angkorian period were so different from what we’ve become today that it might be more fitting– in a sad way– to have non-Khmer actors play the roles of great Khmer figures from the past. And with proper “consultation” with Cambodian government officials, they might even portray Jayavarman VII as an alien from outer space who descended temporarily upon Earth in the 12th century and chose present-day Siem Reap to build Angkor.
I think Khmer people can become great again, but it’s going to take a bit of awakening. We must understand what it takes to become great. Greatness does not come from subservience or passiveness. Greatness starts with knowing where we are and where we need to go. Greatness takes strength, vision, purpose, hard work, unity, courage, and determination. It takes pride, confidence, and assertiveness, tempered by compassion, tolerance, humility, and flexibility. Greatness takes creativity, gumption, and willingness to adapt to changing circumstances. To be great one must constantly pursue excellence and higher good on one’s own initiative and personal moral convictions, not simply to win the approval of others.

